必须声明标量变量 "@Script_ID"。  新型冠状病毒肺炎患者治疗后咽拭子与诱导痰标本病毒核酸检测的比较-《赣南医学院学报》

[1]曾江,刘辉,罗一钧,等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎患者治疗后咽拭子与诱导痰标本病毒核酸检测的比较[J].赣南医学院学报,2020,40(02):1.
 ZENG Jiang,LIU Hui,LUO Yi jun,et al.Comparison of pharyngeal swab and induced sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in patients with 2019-nCoV after treatment[J].JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY,2020,40(02):1.
点击复制

 新型冠状病毒肺炎患者治疗后咽拭子与诱导痰标本病毒核酸检测的比较()
分享到:

《赣南医学院学报》[ISSN:1001-5779/CN:36-1154/R]

卷:
40
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
1
栏目:
新型冠状病毒专题
出版日期:
2020-03-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of pharyngeal swab and induced sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in patients with 2019-nCoV after treatment
作者:
曾江刘辉罗一钧刘春云龚享文赖翔王培兴田慧刘萍刘小艳
 赣州市第五人民医院 赣州市呼吸病研究所,江西 赣州 341000
Author(s):
ZENG Jiang LIU Hui LUO Yijun LIU Chunyun GONG Xiangwen LAI Xiang WANG Peixing TIAN Hui LIU Ping LIU Xiaoyan
The Fifth People’s Hospital of Ganzhou, Ganzhou Respiratory Disease Research Institute, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000
关键词:
新型冠状病毒诱导痰标本咽拭子标本病毒核酸检测
Keywords:
2019-nCoVinduced sputum specimensthroat swab specimenviral nucleic acid testing
分类号:
R511, R446.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较分析新型冠状病毒肺炎患者治疗后咽拭子与诱导痰标本病毒核酸检测效果。方法:对新型冠状病毒肺炎确诊病例治愈后出院的25例患者咽拭子与诱导痰标本病毒核酸检测结果进行分析比较。结果:25 例患者咽拭子和痰标本中,其中13例患者出院前2次诱导痰及咽拭子病毒核酸检测结果均为阴性;另外12例患者治疗后第一次核酸检测中,有3例患者咽拭子阳性而诱导痰阴性,另9例患者诱导痰阳性,咽拭子阴性,之后进行的病毒核酸检测中,诱导痰及咽拭子2次检测均为阴性。结论:在新型冠状病毒实验室核酸检测中,诱导痰标本检测效果优于咽拭子标本,两种方法联合检测更有利于临床诊断。
Abstract:
Objective: To compare and analyze the detection effect of viral nucleic acid testing between pharyngeal swab specimens and induced sputum specimens in posttreatment patient with 2019-nCoV cases. Methods: The results of pharyngeal swab specimens and induced sputum specimens from 25 patients with 2019nCoV and discharged from hospital were analyzed and compared. Results: Among the 25 cases, 13 were negative in two times of induced sputum and pharyngeal swab specimens. . In the first viral nucleic acid testing after treatment, 3 of the other 12 patients were positive for pharyngeal swab specimens and negative for induced sputum specimens, while the other nine patients were positive forinduced sputum specimens and negative for pharyngeal swab specimens. In the subsequent viral nucleic acid testing, however, both induced sputum specimens and pharyngeal swab specimens were negative. Conclusions: In the viral nucleic acid testing of 2019-nCoV, the detection effect of induced sputum specimens was better than that of pharyngeal swab specimens. The combination of the two methods is more conducive to clinical diagnosis.

参考文献/References:

[1]HUANG C, WANG Y, LI X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223):497-506. [2]WANG C, HORBY PW, HAYDEN FG, et al. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223):470-473.
[3]World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (2019-CoV) infection is suspectedInterim guidance[S/OL]. [2020-02-18]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330893/WHOnCoVClinical2020.3chi.pdf.
[4]中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎纳入法定传染病管理[EB/OL].(2020-01-20)[2020-02-18]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s7916/202001/44a3b8245e8049d2837a4f27529cd386.Shtml.
[5]中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会宣传司.世卫: 新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎疫情构成国际关注的突发公共卫生事件[EB/OL].(2020-01-31)[2020-02-18].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/s3574/202002/3fdf885083e5470090728ede3c7f7e4b.shtml.
[6]中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎诊疗方案( 试行第五版)[EB/OL].( 2020-02-08 ). [2020-02-18].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2787.R.20200208.1034.002.html.
[7]王凌航.新型冠状病毒感染的特征及应对[J/OL].中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版):1-5.[2020-02-28].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.9284.r.20200212.1113.002.html.
[8]陈炜,张春阳,朱颖,等.4例新型冠状病毒感染病例咽拭子与痰标本病毒核酸检测的比较[J/OL].中国人兽共患病学报:1-7.[2020-02-28].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/35.1284.R.20200211.2118.002.html.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘金花.探讨新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间检验科实验室生物安全防护的措施[J].赣南医学院学报,2020,40(02):1.
 LIU Jin-hua.Discussion on the measures of biosafety protection in clinical laboratory during the epidemic period of COVID-19[J].JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY,2020,40(02):1.
[2]颜长建,杨寿慧,袁小亮. 新型冠状病毒的来源和受体的研究进展[J].赣南医学院学报,2020,40(03):1.
 YAN Chang-jian,YANG Shou-hui,YUAN Xiao-liang. Research progress of origin and receptor of SARS-CoV-2[J].JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY,2020,40(02):1.
[3]曾 江,刘 辉,罗一钧,等.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者治疗后咽拭子与诱导痰标本病毒核酸检测的比较[J].赣南医学院学报,2020,40(02):116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5779.2020.02.002]
 ZENG Jiang,LIU Hui,LUO Yi-jun,et al.Comparison of pharyngeal swab and induced sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in patients with 2019-nCoV after treatment[J].JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY,2020,40(02):116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5779.2020.02.002]
[4]刘金花.探讨新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间检验科实验室生物安全防护的措施[J].赣南医学院学报,2020,40(02):129.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5779.2020.02.005]
 LIU Jin-hua.Discussion on the measures of biosafety protection in clinical laboratory during the epidemic period of COVID-19[J].JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY,2020,40(02):129.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5779.2020.02.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:曾江,男,本科,主管技师/执业医师,研究方向:医学检验。E-mail:7243633@qq.com
通信作者:刘辉,男,硕士,主任医师,教授,研究方向:卫生管理与信息。E-mail:gzliuhui@126.com
收稿日期:2020-02-18
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-02